<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Interactive&#8217; Websites Need to Evolve Faster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasonkeath.com/interactive-websites-need-to-evolve-faster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasonkeath.com/interactive-websites-need-to-evolve-faster/</link>
	<description>The Evolution of Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:29:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ‘Interactive’ Websites Need to Evolve Faster</title>
		<link>http://jasonkeath.com/interactive-websites-need-to-evolve-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>TechKive &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ‘Interactive’ Websites Need to Evolve Faster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonkeath.com/?p=694#comment-530</guid>
		<description>[...] the rest here: ‘Interactive’ Websites Need to Evolve Faster   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the rest here: ‘Interactive’ Websites Need to Evolve Faster   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guestmission</title>
		<link>http://jasonkeath.com/interactive-websites-need-to-evolve-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>guestmission</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonkeath.com/?p=694#comment-477</guid>
		<description>Missed opportunity of course. As always a product can be challenged to deliver better results pending time and money. But what I do find unfair is how proper credit is never given to the appropriate key stakeholders.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;It is a flash website by the Martin Agency...&quot;  Martin concepted the idea and creative direction but it was the guys @ Domani Studios that should get created for there good use of air and flash development.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.adobe.com/air/2009/07/we_choose_the_moon_apollo_11_a.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.adobe.com/air/2009/07/we_choose_th...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090713005374&amp;newsLang=en&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/pe...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Missed opportunity of course. As always a product can be challenged to deliver better results pending time and money. But what I do find unfair is how proper credit is never given to the appropriate key stakeholders.</p>
<p>&#8220;It is a flash website by the Martin Agency&#8230;&#8221;  Martin concepted the idea and creative direction but it was the guys @ Domani Studios that should get created for there good use of air and flash development.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/air/2009/07/we_choose_the_moon_apollo_11_a.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/air/2009/07/we_choose_th.." rel="nofollow">http://blogs.adobe.com/air/2009/07/we_choose_th..</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&#038;newsId=20090713005374&#038;newsLang=en" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/pe.." rel="nofollow">http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/pe..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Hepburn</title>
		<link>http://jasonkeath.com/interactive-websites-need-to-evolve-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Hepburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonkeath.com/?p=694#comment-452</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that there was a bit of missed opportunity here, but to fully benefit from media/interactive/social advances, NASA needs a MAJOR priority check.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How could being more social reinvigorate interest in space exploration?&lt;br&gt;What are the benefits of renewed interest in space?&lt;br&gt;Would it attract new enthusiasts or just the same small cloister of geeks?&lt;br&gt;What cultural changes would NASA need to be more compelling?&lt;br&gt;Where should this fit on the priority list?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With a budget of $500 gazillion, I&#039;m torn between saying &quot;You have the budget to pull off any social media idea you want&quot; and &quot;What exactly have you accomplished for $500 gazillion?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that there was a bit of missed opportunity here, but to fully benefit from media/interactive/social advances, NASA needs a MAJOR priority check.</p>
<p>How could being more social reinvigorate interest in space exploration?<br />What are the benefits of renewed interest in space?<br />Would it attract new enthusiasts or just the same small cloister of geeks?<br />What cultural changes would NASA need to be more compelling?<br />Where should this fit on the priority list?</p>
<p>With a budget of $500 gazillion, I&#39;m torn between saying &#8220;You have the budget to pull off any social media idea you want&#8221; and &#8220;What exactly have you accomplished for $500 gazillion?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craigritchie</title>
		<link>http://jasonkeath.com/interactive-websites-need-to-evolve-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>craigritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonkeath.com/?p=694#comment-444</guid>
		<description>Agree. Great post. Too many sites are still going for the wow factor &quot;of olde,&quot; without considering the new paradigms of user behaviour and needs... let alone the future of the social web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree. Great post. Too many sites are still going for the wow factor &#8220;of olde,&#8221; without considering the new paradigms of user behaviour and needs&#8230; let alone the future of the social web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

