<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cottonelle Almost Gets Social</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasonkeath.com/cottonelle-almost-gets-social/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasonkeath.com/cottonelle-almost-gets-social/</link>
	<description>The Evolution of Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 17:01:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jakrose</title>
		<link>http://jasonkeath.com/cottonelle-almost-gets-social/comment-page-1/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>jakrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonkeath.com/?p=1112#comment-846</guid>
		<description>I agree Alyssa. There is so much opportunity to do more here. I am not sure&lt;br&gt;if it was more investment of time and money online before hand or after or&lt;br&gt;what, but there is something more needed. It just falls flat for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Alyssa. There is so much opportunity to do more here. I am not sure<br />if it was more investment of time and money online before hand or after or<br />what, but there is something more needed. It just falls flat for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jakrose</title>
		<link>http://jasonkeath.com/cottonelle-almost-gets-social/comment-page-1/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>jakrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonkeath.com/?p=1112#comment-845</guid>
		<description>Having the simple online interaction is nice. But it just is not enough. If&lt;br&gt;you really want to engage people long term, which every company does,&lt;br&gt;especially a consumer packaged good, you have to do a little more than an A&lt;br&gt;or B question and a little map.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having the simple online interaction is nice. But it just is not enough. If<br />you really want to engage people long term, which every company does,<br />especially a consumer packaged good, you have to do a little more than an A<br />or B question and a little map.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alyssa G</title>
		<link>http://jasonkeath.com/cottonelle-almost-gets-social/comment-page-1/#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>Alyssa G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonkeath.com/?p=1112#comment-843</guid>
		<description>These commercials are great - they&#039;re concise, funny and effective. However, I think you make a great point that Cottonelle is falling short with their social media execution. The campaign would have been made more effective by building their Twitter, Facebook and YouTube accounts for a few months before launching the TV placements. The audience would be more engaged, and I think the TV spots would have been even more popular.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Instead of building a relationship, it&#039;s a mildly successful campaign. Any impact will fizzle a few weeks after the media buys conclude. I think this is a huge missed opportunity to tie together TV with social media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These commercials are great &#8211; they&#39;re concise, funny and effective. However, I think you make a great point that Cottonelle is falling short with their social media execution. The campaign would have been made more effective by building their Twitter, Facebook and YouTube accounts for a few months before launching the TV placements. The audience would be more engaged, and I think the TV spots would have been even more popular.</p>
<p>Instead of building a relationship, it&#39;s a mildly successful campaign. Any impact will fizzle a few weeks after the media buys conclude. I think this is a huge missed opportunity to tie together TV with social media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brashear</title>
		<link>http://jasonkeath.com/cottonelle-almost-gets-social/comment-page-1/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brashear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonkeath.com/?p=1112#comment-842</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen the spots yet but will keep an eye out for them. Its always possible they didn&#039;t have the funding available to do a larger online strategy. While funds are increasingly  to implement these programs there are still a lot of C-Suites saying &quot;prove it&quot;. This could be Cottonelle&#039;s &quot;prove it&quot; campaign that justifies more activity (and funding) in the future given they are happy with the results. I do think the interactive map on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cottonellerollpoll.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cottonellerollpoll.com/&lt;/a&gt; is a nice touch. Is the whole campaign groundbreaking and revolutionary... probably not. The positive sign is they built these ads with the CTA being participate online by voting, posting content, etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#39;t seen the spots yet but will keep an eye out for them. Its always possible they didn&#39;t have the funding available to do a larger online strategy. While funds are increasingly  to implement these programs there are still a lot of C-Suites saying &#8220;prove it&#8221;. This could be Cottonelle&#39;s &#8220;prove it&#8221; campaign that justifies more activity (and funding) in the future given they are happy with the results. I do think the interactive map on <a href="http://www.cottonellerollpoll.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cottonellerollpoll.com/</a> is a nice touch. Is the whole campaign groundbreaking and revolutionary&#8230; probably not. The positive sign is they built these ads with the CTA being participate online by voting, posting content, etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

